<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The incumbent&#8217;s solution: 90% transformation, 10% innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/tincumbents-solution-transformation-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/tincumbents-solution-transformation-innovation/</link>
	<description>What is it? How does it work? What can you do about it?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Waghorn</title>
		<link>http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/tincumbents-solution-transformation-innovation/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Waghorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-19</guid>
		<description>The other advantage that Argos, HMV and The Guardian have over, say, Archant is geography.

As in they haven&#039;t got any. Archant, TrinityMirror, Johnston et al have.

Archant can innovate 100%; transform themselves 100%. But if you still can&#039;t deliver either in Bury St Edmunds, you&#039;re in big trouble... which ain&#039;t good news for my Mrs...

http://outwithabang.rickwaghorn.co.uk/?p=127</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other advantage that Argos, HMV and The Guardian have over, say, Archant is geography.</p>
<p>As in they haven&#8217;t got any. Archant, TrinityMirror, Johnston et al have.</p>
<p>Archant can innovate 100%; transform themselves 100%. But if you still can&#8217;t deliver either in Bury St Edmunds, you&#8217;re in big trouble&#8230; which ain&#8217;t good news for my Mrs&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://outwithabang.rickwaghorn.co.uk/?p=127" rel="nofollow">http://outwithabang.rickwaghorn.co.uk/?p=127</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Donald</title>
		<link>http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/tincumbents-solution-transformation-innovation/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-17</guid>
		<description>And the other dimension is simply implemeting any of it fast enough.

As I recollect, I first heard of HMV&#039;s Get Closer being announced in spring 2007 - so the strategy must have been developed several months before that. Yet it took until Dec 07 even for beta testers to be invited. Exactly the same time that Facebook was taking off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the other dimension is simply implemeting any of it fast enough.</p>
<p>As I recollect, I first heard of HMV&#8217;s Get Closer being announced in spring 2007 &#8211; so the strategy must have been developed several months before that. Yet it took until Dec 07 even for beta testers to be invited. Exactly the same time that Facebook was taking off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadblog &#187; links for 2008-08-20</title>
		<link>http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/tincumbents-solution-transformation-innovation/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Dadblog &#187; links for 2008-08-20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] The incumbent’s solution: 90% transformation, 10% innovation « Digital disruption Waldo on the need for transformation, not innovation. (tags: disruption organisationalchange) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The incumbent’s solution: 90% transformation, 10% innovation « Digital disruption Waldo on the need for transformation, not innovation. (tags: disruption organisationalchange) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-08-20 &#171; Media Platforms</title>
		<link>http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/tincumbents-solution-transformation-innovation/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-08-20 &#171; Media Platforms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldisruption.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] The incumbent’s solution: 90% transformation, 10% innovation « Digital disruption Waldo on the need for transformation, not innovation. (tags: disruption organisationalchange) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The incumbent’s solution: 90% transformation, 10% innovation « Digital disruption Waldo on the need for transformation, not innovation. (tags: disruption organisationalchange) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
